The district court directed its substantive analysis to limitations in claim 34. Initially newegg was found to have infringed the patents in suit and soverain. I started with wikipedias article on soverain software. Online retailer newegg scored a major victory against a wellknown patent. High court wont eye obviousness in newegg patent case. The closely watched case involved the online shopping site newegg inc, which specializes in computer products, and software company soverain software llc, which had accused newegg of. Soverain software llc provides ecommerce software and services for enterprises, focusing on the publishing, news syndicate and digital content industries, and its flagship product transact has. Sep 04, 20 earlier today the united states court of appeals for the federal circuit issued it latest decision in soverain software llc v. Im a big wikipedia fan, but articles about littleknown companies run the risk of getting more attention from the companys friends than. Sealed motion emergency opposed motion to disqualify jones day filed by newegg inc. Soverain software llc brought this patent infringement suit against newegg inc. Computer parts, pc components, laptop computers, led. Newegg declined to pay, stating that its system is materially different and that the patents are invalid if given the scope asserted by soverain.
There, we held invalid as obvious claims 34 and 51 of the 314 patent and claims 17, 41, and 61 of the 492 patent. Newegg confirms commitment to challenging patent claims covering common ecommerce functionalities 9222010 press release. Newegg s opening brief stated that soverain asserted claim 34, and that claim 34 is representative of the shopping cart claims. We have considered the issues with respect to claim 35, based on the parties initial briefing and arguments and in light of the supplemental. Whether the federal circuits effective redefinition of obviousness as a pure question of law, allowing it to resolve disputed factual questions in the first. Llc and may not be used by third parties without explicit permission.
Jan 22, 20 soverain software llc brought this patent infringement suit against newegg inc. Court of appeals for the federal circuit newman, prost, reyna reversedinpart and vacatedinpart the district courts. We confirmed that claim 34 is representative of the shopping cart claims, including claim 35, and concluded that dependent claim 35 is invalid on the ground of obviousness. The district court, criticizing neweggs evidence on the issue of obviousness, removed that issue from the jury and decided it as a matter of law. Court of appeals for the federal circuit newman, prost, reyna reversedinpart and vacatedinpart the district courts judgment that newegg infringed u. Soverain software llc sued newegg and several other online retailers in 2010 for infringing upon three patents related to the shopping carts. Fong, pillsbury winthrop shaw pittman, llp, of houston, texas. Mar 24, 2015 after the district courts judgment, this court decided soverain software llc v. Soverain s brief on this appeal mentioned that claim 35 was in suit, but did not discuss the limitation in that claim or other soverain software v. Jan 23, 20 on january 22, 20, in soverain software llc v. While the court will likely hear the remaining cases, which deal. Newegg when i saw someone ask if soverain software was a patent troll. Soverain software llc page 2 close of the evidence, the district court determined that newegg s obviousness challenge to soverain s patents was so deficient that the issue should not even go.
Newegg also pointed out that licenses were taken to avoid the costs of litigation, and not to use the system. Does fighting back work, or is the patent system simply. Soverain ruling threatens patent system, high court told. Newegg crushes patent troll in online shopping cart suit pcmag. New and useful january 31, 20 january 29, 20 in soverain software llc v. On appeal, the federal circuit reversed the district courts judgment, holding that issue preclusion applied in light of its previous decision in soverain software llc v. Soverain software, a nonpracticing entity that gained media attention for suing newegg and other online retailers over shopping cart patents. I first clued into this case in early september 20, when the united states court of appeals for the federal circuit had just issued it latest decision in soverain software llc v. Internet patent owner loses supreme court bid to revive suit. Soverain software llc was a chicagobased company which owned patents for its ecommerce technology products. Soverain filed suit in late 2007, newegg said, adding that if an. District court for the eastern district of texas, tyler division entered final judgment in the case soverain software llc v. Infamous patent troll soverain software targets apple products and.
The record showed that the software was abandoned by almost all of its initial licenses. After the district courts judgment, this court decided soverain software llc v. How newegg crushed the shopping cart patent and saved online. Soverain software v newegg obviousness january 22, 20. Sep 28, 2009 newegg disclosed in its ipo registration filing that its currently being sued for patent infringement by soverain software llc. Newegg disclosed in its ipo registration filing that its currently being sued for patent infringement by soverain software llc. I was reading about the us supreme court declining to hear soverain v. Is this the beginning of the end for patent trolls. Jan 25, 20 on january 22, 20, in soverain software llc v. Jan, 2014 the closely watched case involved the online shopping site newegg inc, which specializes in computer products, and software company soverain software llc, which had accused newegg of infringing. Supreme court refuses to hear internet shopping patent case.
The court received briefs from each of soverain and newegg on june 24, 20, and responses on july 9, 20. Soverain ruling threatens patent system, high court told law360. Earlier today the united states court of appeals for the federal circuit issued it latest decision in soverain software llc v. Newegg provided evidence that soverains system was abandoned by its developers and most of its original users. The district courts removal of the legal question of obviousness from the jury did not violate the right to a jury trial. Newegg obtains successful outcome in patent infringement lawsuit 5042010 press release. Whether the federal circuits effective redefinition of obviousness as a pure question of law, allowing it to resolve disputed factual questions in the first instance on appeal, violates the seventh amendment and th. Sep 30, 20 soverain software llc page 2 close of the evidence, the district court determined that neweggs obviousness challenge to soverains patents was so deficient that the issue should not even go.
United states court of appeals for the federal circuit. Newegg wins victory against shopping cart patent holder san. The company held patents for digital shopping carts commonly used on ecommerce websites, such as and collected royalties on these patents, but ultimately their patents were invalidated. Supreme court on monday to reverse a federal circuit decision invalidating a soverain software llc ecommerce patent asserted against newegg. Parties, docket activity and news coverage of federal case soverain software llc v. Does fighting back work, or is the patent system simply broken. On january 30, justice elena kagan attended the new york state bar associations annual gala, where she received the associations gold medal for distinguished service in the law and held a discussion with professor john barrett of st. City of industry, ca on september 10, 2010, newegg inc. Anyone who visited soverain softwares website could be forgiven for believing its a real company. Although both sides had presented witnesses and evidence on the question of obviousness, the district courts removal of the legal question from the jury did not violate the right to jury trial. Internet patent owner loses high court bid to revive suit. Get free access to the complete judgment in soverain software llc v.
879 133 457 511 294 1644 1478 415 1507 1455 627 709 268 125 1160 635 769 1172 126 1099 1317 1610 932 1522 1187 637 1476 306 336 120 440 1373 793 715 1431 257 1269 639 974